Stec v UK 65731/01 (2006) ECHR 393: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[Stec v UK 65731/01 (2005) ECHR 924]] - admissibility | * [[Stec v UK 65731/01 (2005) ECHR 924]] - admissibility | ||
==Related legislation== | |||
[[Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005]] | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 1 January 2009
Judgment of Grand Chamber. State benefits, Article 1 of Protocol No 1 & Article 14.
Related cases
Stec v UK 65731/01 [2006] ECHR 393 - judgment of Grand Chamber
- Stec v UK 65731/01 [2005] ECHR 924 - admissibility
Related legislation
Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: