SS v UK 40356/10 (2011) ECHR 107: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Case |Date=2011/01/14 |NCN=[2011] ECHR 107 |Court=European Court of Human Rights |Parties=SS, FA, HB, EM, ALF, United Kingdom |Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred pris...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners | |Sentence=Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners | ||
|Summary=''Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the [[Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010]], have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to [[Article 14]] of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of [[Protocol No 1]]?" '' | |Summary=''Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the [[Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010]], have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to [[Article 14]] of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of [[Protocol No 1]]?" '' | ||
|News= | |News=Yes | ||
|RSS pubdate=2021/03/11 12:23:55 AM | |RSS pubdate=2021/03/11 12:23:55 AM | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 00:26, 11 March 2021
Welfare benefits and transferred prisoners Questions to the parties: "Insofar as their complaints concern the provisions of the Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010, have the fourth and fifth applicants exhausted domestic remedies? Have the applicants suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of their Convention rights on the ground of their prisoner status and/or their disabilities contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No 1?"
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
Date: 14 January 2011🔍
Court: European Court of Human Rights🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
What links here:- R (EM) v SSWP [2009] EWHC 454 (Admin)
- R (D and M) v SSWP [2010] EWCA Civ 18
- Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010
- Welfare benefits
- SS v UK 40356/10 54466/10 [2015] ECHR 520
Published: 11/3/21 00:25
Cached: 2025-08-24 20:11:02
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: