Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill 2017-19: Difference between revisions

(Created page with ""A Bill to amend the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in relation to procedures in accordance with which a person may be deprived of liberty where the person lacks capacity to consent...")
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==External links==
==External links==
* [https://services.parliament.uk/Bills/2017-19/mentalcapacityamendment.html Parliament website: Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL] 2017-19: Progress of the Bill]
* [https://services.parliament.uk/Bills/2017-19/mentalcapacityamendment.html Parliament website: Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL] 2017-19: Progress of the Bill]
*{{pagesummary|Alex Ruck Keene, 'Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill published - headlines' (Mental Capacity Law and Policy, 4/7/18)}}


[[Category:Other useful legislation]]
[[Category:Other useful legislation]]

Revision as of 22:43, 4 July 2018

"A Bill to amend the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in relation to procedures in accordance with which a person may be deprived of liberty where the person lacks capacity to consent, and for connected purposes."

External links

  • Alex Ruck Keene, 'Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill published - headlines' (Mental Capacity Law and Policy, 4/7/18) — This article notes the following information about the Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill 2017-19: "(1) The Bill is focused solely upon a (version of) the Liberty Protection Safeguards, so the Law Commission’s proposed amendments to ss.4/5 have gone, as have regulation-making powers in relation to supported decision-making; (2) There is no statutory definition of deprivation of liberty (or provision for advance consent); (3) There are provisions for emergency deprivation of liberty/deprivations pending authorisation under the LPS; (4) The scheme of the LPS is broadly replicated, albeit from age 18 upwards, and with a significant change in relation to care homes, where considerably more responsibility is going to be placed on the care home managers in terms of arranging assessments/carrying out consultation. The reference to necessity/proportionality is no longer tied specifically to risk of harm/risk to self, but simply, now, necessity and proportionality; (5) The Law Commission’s proposed tort of unlawful deprivation of liberty (actionable against a private care provider) has gone; (6) The LPS ‘line’ of excluding the LPS from the mental health arrangements has been changed, and the current status quo (i.e. objection) as regards the dividing line between the MCA/MHA in DOLS is maintained."