Re Daniel X (2016) EWFC B31: Difference between revisions

m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:")
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
"This is the final hearing of the care proceedings brought by Thurrock Borough Council in relation to Daniel X, a boy of 10. ... It is also the final hearing of the application by Thurrock Borough Council for me to authorise them to deprive Daniel of his liberty by accommodating him in Y Home. ... The outstanding issue is that of Daniel's liberty, and there is a great deal of consensus on this point too. However, it has been agreed at the bar that it would be helpful if I set out the position in law and how I consider the law applies to Daniel."
{{Case
 
|Date=2016/05/13
==External link==
|NCN=[2016] EWFC B31
{{#bailii:(2016) EWFC B31}}
|Court=Family Court
 
|Judges=Lynn Roberts
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
|Parties=Daniel X
[[Category:No summary]]
|Sentence=DOL of child
[[Category:Transcript]]
|Summary="This is the final hearing of the care proceedings brought by Thurrock Borough Council in relation to Daniel X, a boy of 10. ... It is also the final hearing of the application by Thurrock Borough Council for me to authorise them to deprive Daniel of his liberty by accommodating him in Y Home. ... The outstanding issue is that of Daniel's liberty, and there is a great deal of consensus on this point too. However, it has been agreed at the bar that it would be helpful if I set out the position in law and how I consider the law applies to Daniel."
[[Category:2016 cases]]
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty - children
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2021-10-11 02:07:41 PM
}}

Revision as of 14:07, 11 October 2021

DOL of child "This is the final hearing of the care proceedings brought by Thurrock Borough Council in relation to Daniel X, a boy of 10. ... It is also the final hearing of the application by Thurrock Borough Council for me to authorise them to deprive Daniel of his liberty by accommodating him in Y Home. ... The outstanding issue is that of Daniel's liberty, and there is a great deal of consensus on this point too. However, it has been agreed at the bar that it would be helpful if I set out the position in law and how I consider the law applies to Daniel."

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 13/5/16🔍

Court: Family Court🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:
  • No pages link to this page

Published: 13/5/16 21:33

Cached: 2025-06-22 21:35:49