Neary v LB Hillingdon (2013) MHLO 87 (SEC): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Mark Neary's appeal against Hillingdon's decision to end Housing Benefit was unsuccessful: as he was estranged from his wife, who lived separately in a jointly-owned property, his share of the property counted towards the statutory limit for Housing Benefit purposes.'' | ''Mark Neary's appeal against Hillingdon's decision to end Housing Benefit was unsuccessful: as he was estranged from his wife, who lived separately in a jointly-owned property, his share of the property counted towards the statutory limit for Housing Benefit purposes.'' | ||
==Related judgments== | |||
[[Neary v LB Hillingdon (2013) MHLO 87 (SEC)]] | |||
[[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2012) MHLO 71 (COP)]] | |||
*[[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2011) EWHC 3522 (COP)]] | |||
**[[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2011) EWHC 1377 (COP)]] | |||
***[[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2011) EWHC 413 (COP)]] | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:24, 8 September 2013
Mark Neary's appeal against Hillingdon's decision to end Housing Benefit was unsuccessful: as he was estranged from his wife, who lived separately in a jointly-owned property, his share of the property counted towards the statutory limit for Housing Benefit purposes.
Related judgments
Neary v LB Hillingdon [2013] MHLO 87 (SEC)
Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2012] MHLO 71 (COP)
External link
Not on Baliii at time of writing
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: