Re BS; SC v BS (2012) MHLO 78 (COP): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The jointly-instructed psychiatrist, although an expert in autism, did not have experience of applying the test for capacity in the context of litigation in the Court if Pro...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Not on Bailii at time of writing. | Not on Bailii at time of writing. | ||
{{copco|2994}} | |||
[[Media:Re BS; SC v BS (2012) MHLO 78 (COP).pdf|Transcript]] (with the original expert's name removed) | [[Media:Re BS; SC v BS (2012) MHLO 78 (COP).pdf|Transcript]] (with the original expert's name removed) | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 18 August 2012
The jointly-instructed psychiatrist, although an expert in autism, did not have experience of applying the test for capacity in the context of litigation in the Court if Protection, so the court directed that an alternative expert be instructed.
Other
Date: 7/10/11
Before: Baker J
Mr John McKendrick appeared on behalf of the Applicant
Mr Joseph O'Brien appeared on behalf of the First Respondent
Ms Laura Davidson appeared on behalf of the Second Respondent
Citations
Case no 11987961
External link
Not on Bailii at time of writing.
Transcript (with the original expert's name removed)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: