R v Ukpabio (2007) EWCA Crim 2108: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Crim\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Crim $2}}") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2007] EWCA Crim 2108}} | ||
Revision as of 11:19, 25 April 2021
The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 provide the complete statutory scheme for providing evidence via video link, and the court had no jurisdiction to direct that a defendant's evidence be given by video link (NB the 1999 Act has since been amended); however, in exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate for a defendant to participate by video link, but this did not apply in this case and the refusal of video link facilities did not cause any prejudice; the restriction order was appropriate.
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: