R (AL) v SSHD (2005) EWCA Civ 2: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (tidying)
Line 1: Line 1:
Can be recalled for any mental disorder.
''Can be recalled for any mental disorder.''
 
== Facts ==


Client recalled for different disorder to that which he was 'classified' as suffering from when conditionally discharged.
Client recalled for different disorder to that which he was 'classified' as suffering from when conditionally discharged.
== Decision ==


Recall lawful. Client was s5 CPIA 1964 so not classified in the first place. Would have been lawful even if s37/41.
Recall lawful. Client was s5 CPIA 1964 so not classified in the first place. Would have been lawful even if s37/41.

Revision as of 22:06, 23 October 2006

Can be recalled for any mental disorder.

Client recalled for different disorder to that which he was 'classified' as suffering from when conditionally discharged.

Recall lawful. Client was s5 CPIA 1964 so not classified in the first place. Would have been lawful even if s37/41.

External links

Bailii