R v H (2003) UKHL 1: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Adding category Unfitness and insanity cases) |
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:No summary]] | [[Category:No summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2003 cases]] | [[Category:2003 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]] | [[Category:Unfitness and insanity cases]] | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 8 January 2012
Article 6 does not apply to proceedings under sections 4 (finding of unfitness to plead) and 4A (finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him) Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964.
Related judgments
- R v M [2001] EWCA Crim 2024 (H was one of three appellants here)
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: