SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an Article 5 deprivation of liberty.'' =...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an [[Article 5]] deprivation of liberty.''
''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an [[Article 5]] deprivation of liberty.''
==Related judgments==
[[SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608]]
*[[SSJ v RB (2010) UKUT 454 (AAC)]]
:*[[R (RB) v First-tier Tribunal (Review) (2010) UKUT 160 (AAC)]]
Other related cases:
*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re PH (2002) EWCA Civ 1868]]
:*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re PH (2002) EWHC 1128 (Admin)]]
*[[R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)]]
*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re MP (2004) EWHC 2194]]
*[[R (IT) v SSJ (2008) EWHC 1707]]


==Other==
==Other==

Revision as of 13:09, 31 December 2011

The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an Article 5 deprivation of liberty.

Related judgments

SSJ v RB [2011] EWCA Civ 1608

Other related cases:

Other

Hearing: 12/10/11

Judgment 20/12/11

Before Maurice Kay, Arden, Moses LJJ

Mr Martin Chamberlain (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Appellant

Mr Simon Burrows (instructed by odonnells Solicitors) for the First Respondent

The Second Respondent did not appear

External link

...