Clift v Slough BC (2010) EWCA Civ 1484: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.''
''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.''
==Citations==
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 and ''not'' [2010] EWCA Civ 1171.


==External link==
==External link==

Revision as of 18:57, 30 April 2011

An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of Article 8; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.

Citations

Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484B and not [2010] EWCA Civ 1171B.

External link

...

Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 8, March 2011)