Clift v Slough BC (2010) EWCA Civ 1484: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach ...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.'' | ''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.'' | ||
==Citations== | |||
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 and ''not'' [2010] EWCA Civ 1171. | |||
==External link== | ==External link== |
Revision as of 18:57, 30 April 2011
An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of Article 8; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.
Citations
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484B and not [2010] EWCA Civ 1171B.
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: