Re Cretney (2011) COP 24/2/11: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The donor made an LPA on the "new" form prescribed in 2009 but omitted the attorney's date of birth in Part A. The Public Guardian refused to register on the ground that the in...") |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:2011 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 18 March 2011
The donor made an LPA on the "new" form prescribed in 2009 but omitted the attorney's date of birth in Part A. The Public Guardian refused to register on the ground that the instrument differed materially from the prescribed form. On the application of the attorney (who was over 18) the court declared in the exercise of its discretion under paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 of the MCA that the instrument was to be treated as if it were in the prescribed form. [OPG summary - LPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG website.
Title: Re Cretney (an order of the Senior Judge made on 24 February 2011)
Heading: Attorney's date of birth missing
External link
Not on Bailii - no transcript
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: