R v AN (2004) EWCA Crim 3238: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there ...") |
m (typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was | ''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was not excessive.'' | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 9 December 2010
(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was not excessive.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: