Re Orriss (2010) COP 20/10/10: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "''By mistake the donor's surname was omitted from the instrument, which included only his first and second names. The EPA was registered without the mistake being discovered. On ...")
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
[http://www.publicguardian.gov.uk/forms/cop-epa-orders.htm Summary on OPG website]
[http://www.publicguardian.gov.uk/forms/cop-epa-orders.htm Summary on OPG website]


[[Category:EPA cases]]
[[Category:EPA cases - rectification]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]

Revision as of 18:56, 18 March 2011

By mistake the donor's surname was omitted from the instrument, which included only his first and second names. The EPA was registered without the mistake being discovered. On the application of the attorney the court directed the Public Guardian to attach a note to the EPA stating that the donor's surname had been omitted in error from Part B. [OPG summary - EPA case.]

Note

Summary from OPG website.

Title: Re Orriss (an order of District Judge Ralton made on 20 October 2010)

Heading: Rectification

External link

Not on Bailii - no transcript

Summary on OPG website