LBL v RYJ (2010) EWHC 2665 (COP): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "RYJ had capacity in relation to care, contact, residential education and residence, and was not vulnerable as a result of external factors so as to invoke the inherent jurisdicti...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
RYJ had capacity in relation to care, contact, residential education and residence, and was not vulnerable as a result of external factors so as to invoke the inherent jurisdiction; discussion of mother's status as appointee and her application to | RYJ had capacity in relation to care, contact, residential education and residence, and was not vulnerable as a result of external factors so as to invoke the inherent jurisdiction; discussion of mother's status as appointee and her application to SENDIST. [Summary required.] | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 08:24, 26 November 2010
RYJ had capacity in relation to care, contact, residential education and residence, and was not vulnerable as a result of external factors so as to invoke the inherent jurisdiction; discussion of mother's status as appointee and her application to SENDIST. [Summary required.]
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: