Re MB (Medical Treatment) (1997) EWCA Civ 3093: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a you…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." [Summary required.] | "This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." [Summary required.] | ||
==Citations== | |||
[1997] 2 FLR 426 | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 20 July 2010
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." [Summary required.]
Citations
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: