G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 548: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Related judgments== | ==Related judgments== | ||
[[G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 548]] | [[G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 822]] | ||
*[[G v E (2010) EWHC 621 (Fam)]] | *[[G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 548]] | ||
:*[[G v E (2010) EWHC 621 (Fam)]] | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 00:18, 18 July 2010
Successful renewed application for permission to appeal: it was arguable that the judge was wrong in deciding that the court may entertain an application for an order under s16 MCA 2005 that would have the effect of depriving a person of his liberty without being satisfied that his condition warrants compulsory confinement. Permission was given on other grounds also. [Summary required.]
Related judgments
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: