G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 548: Difference between revisions

(Created page with 'Successful renewed application for permission to appeal: it was arguable that the judge was wrong in deciding that the court may entertain an application for an order under s16 M…')
 
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]

Revision as of 21:00, 10 July 2010

Successful renewed application for permission to appeal: it was arguable that the judge was wrong in deciding that the court may entertain an application for an order under s16 MCA 2005 that would have the effect of depriving a person of his liberty without being satisfied that his condition warrants compulsory confinement. Permission was given on other grounds also. [Summary required.]

Related judgments

G v E [2010] EWCA Civ 548

External link

Bailii