R (Munday) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 3638 (Admin): Difference between revisions
(Created page with '''The MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the di…') |
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{bailii|(2009) EWHC 3638 (Admin)|no}} | {{bailii|(2009) EWHC 3638 (Admin)|no}} | ||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | [[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | ||
Revision as of 21:26, 26 May 2015
The MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the disagreement was not on medical grounds but on whether, given the history of arson and recent disengagement, a mere allegation of and arrest for arson was sufficient justification for recall.
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: