R v M (2001) EWCA Crim 2024: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'Article 6 does not apply to proceedings under sections 4 (finding of unfitness to plead) and 4A (finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him...') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Article 6]] does not apply to proceedings under sections 4 (finding of unfitness to plead) and 4A (finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him) [[Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964]]. | [[Article 6]] does not apply to proceedings under sections 4 (finding of unfitness to plead) and 4A (finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him) [[Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964]]. | ||
==Related judgments== | |||
[[R v H (2003) UKHL 1]] | |||
*[[R v M (2001) EWCA Crim 2024]] (H was one of three appellants here) | |||
==External link== | ==External link== |
Revision as of 15:15, 11 April 2009
Article 6 does not apply to proceedings under sections 4 (finding of unfitness to plead) and 4A (finding that the accused did the act or made the omission charged against him) Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964.
Related judgments
- R v M [2001] EWCA Crim 2024 (H was one of three appellants here)
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: