Grey v UK 34377/02 (2002) ECHR 854: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")
Line 9: Line 9:
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2002/854.html Bailii]
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2002/854.html Bailii]


{{stub}}


[[Category:Absolute or conditional discharge]]
[[Category:Absolute or conditional discharge]]

Revision as of 21:17, 26 May 2015

A Tribunal granted an absolute discharge because the claimant suffered from no mental disorder, but on judicial review this was quashed because they had not first considered conditional discharge; a subsequent Tribunal reclassified him and upheld continued detention; his complaint under Article 5(1)(e) was rejected (no duty immediately and unconditionally to release into the community), as were complaints under Article 5(4) (no undue delay) and Article 6 (no right to appeal).

Related judgments

Grey v UK 34377/02 [2002] ECHR 854

External link

Bailii