Gajcsi v Hungary 34503/03 (2006) ECHR 822: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '''The continuation of the claimant's detention for three months was not in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law, in that dangerous conduct had not been considered by the...')
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2006 cases]]
[[Category:2006 cases]]

Revision as of 20:55, 10 July 2010

The continuation of the claimant's detention for three months was not in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law, in that dangerous conduct had not been considered by the reviewing court; there had therefore been a breach of Article 5(1) and compensation of €7350 was awarded

External link

Bailii