Pankiewicz v Poland 34151/04 (2008) ECHR 148: Difference between revisions
(New page: ''It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] | ||
[[Category:ECHR]] | [[Category:ECHR]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2008 cases]] | [[Category:2008 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 10 July 2010
It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on balance it was not acceptable and violated Article 5(1); the claimant had been compensated by the domestic court so was not a victim for Article 5(3) purposes; the Article 6 complaint was rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: