R v C (2008) EWCA Crim 1155: Difference between revisions
(New page: ''If the complainant consented to sexual activity against her inclination because she was frightened of the defendant, even if her fear was irrational and caused by her mental disorder, it...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:Criminal law]] | [[Category:Criminal law]] | ||
[[Category:Capacity]] | [[Category:Capacity]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2008 cases]] | [[Category:2008 cases]] | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 19 January 2009
If the complainant consented to sexual activity against her inclination because she was frightened of the defendant, even if her fear was irrational and caused by her mental disorder, it did not follow that she lacked the capacity to choose whether to agree to sexual activity
External link
Bailii - not on Bailii at time of writing
Criminal Solicitor Dot Net - Detailed summary here (registration required but is free)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: