Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011: Difference between revisions

(Replacing dead LSC link)
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:
|External links=* [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldhansrd/text/111026-0002.htm Hansard HL Deb, 26 October 2011, col 831].  This is the transcript of a debate in the House of Lords on a motion to annul the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011 (the order which reduces civil fee rates by 10%); following the debate the motion was withdrawn.
|External links=* [https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldhansrd/text/111026-0002.htm Hansard HL Deb, 26 October 2011, col 831].  This is the transcript of a debate in the House of Lords on a motion to annul the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011 (the order which reduces civil fee rates by 10%); following the debate the motion was withdrawn.


* [[Media:2011-11-09 LSC Civil Legal Aid Expert's Fees.pdf|LSC, 'Legal Aid Reform - Civil Legal Aid Experts' Fees' (9/11/11)]] - related to CLS News item dated 27/10/11
* [[Media:2011-11-09 LSC Civil Legal Aid Experts Fees.pdf|LSC, 'Legal Aid Reform - Civil Legal Aid Experts' Fees' (9/11/11)]] - related to CLS News item dated 27/10/11
|News=No
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2021/04/08 05:38:29 PM
|RSS pubdate=2021/04/08 05:38:29 PM
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 18:31, 8 April 2021

This order, amongst other things, reduces the Legal Aid rates for mental health law (and other civil work) by 10%: the old and new fees are set out in Legal Aid#Payments. It also introduces maximum payments for experts: for instance, psychiatrists (£90 London, £135 non-London) and psychologists (£90 London, £117 non-London). In force 3/10/11 (for cases started on or after that date).

Related legislation

External links

  • Hansard HL Deb, 26 October 2011, col 831. This is the transcript of a debate in the House of Lords on a motion to annul the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011 (the order which reduces civil fee rates by 10%); following the debate the motion was withdrawn.