Re Edmonds (2012) MHLO 129 (LPA): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The donor appointed a sole attorney and then two replacements, the latter to act jointly for some decisions and jointly and severally for others. She then directed as follow...") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:LPA cases - all" to "") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
{{#bailii:no tran}} | |||
{{lpa-summary-link}} | {{lpa-summary-link}} | ||
[[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions | [[Category:LPA cases - severance of restrictions]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:No transcript]] | [[Category:No transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2012 cases]] | [[Category:2012 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:58, 2 May 2021
The donor appointed a sole attorney and then two replacements, the latter to act jointly for some decisions and jointly and severally for others. She then directed as follows: "I would like my replacement attorneys to act jointly as much as possible and always where any transaction is valued at more than £5,000." On the application of the Public Guardian the words "as much as possible and always" were severed on the ground that they were uncertain and incompatible with the appointment type. [OPG summary - LPA case.]
Note
Summary from OPG section of Justice website.
Case title: Re Edmonds (an order of the Senior Judge made on 12 November 2012)
Listed under heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with an appointment to act jointly in some matters and jointly and severally in others
External link
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website . This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).