R (Johnson) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 3336 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Changing Category:Prison law to Category:Prison law cases) |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2009] EWHC 3336 (Admin)}} | ||
[[Category:Prison law cases]] | [[Category:Prison law cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 25 April 2021
The Secretary of State's decision that the next Parole Board review would occur 14-15 months after the last review was unsupported by any reason and, on the facts, inconsistent with Article 5(4).
Other
Judgment: 18 December 2009
Hearing date: 3 December 2009
Before: Langstaff J
Mr Southey (instructed by Chivers Solicitors) for the Claimant
Mr Gerard Clarke (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Defendant
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: