R v Ukpabio (2007) EWCA Crim 2108: Difference between revisions
m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law) |
m (Text replacement - "{{caselaw-stub}}" to "") |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2007] EWCA Crim 2108}} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 26 April 2021
The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 provide the complete statutory scheme for providing evidence via video link, and the court had no jurisdiction to direct that a defendant's evidence be given by video link (NB the 1999 Act has since been amended); however, in exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate for a defendant to participate by video link, but this did not apply in this case and the refusal of video link facilities did not cause any prejudice; the restriction order was appropriate.
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: