R v Ukpabio (2007) EWCA Crim 2108: Difference between revisions

m (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law)
m (Text replacement - "{{caselaw-stub}}" to "")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==External links==
==External links==


[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2007/2108.html Bailii]
{{#bailii: [2007] EWCA Crim 2108}}
 




{{caselaw-stub}}


[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]

Latest revision as of 19:17, 26 April 2021

The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 provide the complete statutory scheme for providing evidence via video link, and the court had no jurisdiction to direct that a defendant's evidence be given by video link (NB the 1999 Act has since been amended); however, in exceptional circumstances, it might be appropriate for a defendant to participate by video link, but this did not apply in this case and the refusal of video link facilities did not cause any prejudice; the restriction order was appropriate.

External links

BAILII