SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an Article 5 deprivation of liberty.'' =...") |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an [[Article 5]] deprivation of liberty.'' | ''The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an [[Article 5]] deprivation of liberty. Postscript: see [[PJ v A Local Health Board (2015) UKUT 480 (AAC)]].'' | ||
==Related judgments== | |||
[[SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608]] | |||
*[[SSJ v RB (2010) UKUT 454 (AAC)]] | |||
:*[[R (RB) v First-tier Tribunal (Review) (2010) UKUT 160 (AAC)]] | |||
Other related cases: | |||
*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re PH (2002) EWCA Civ 1868]] | |||
:*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re PH (2002) EWHC 1128 (Admin)]] | |||
*[[R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)]] | |||
*[[R (SSHD) v MHRT, re MP (2004) EWHC 2194]] | |||
*[[R (IT) v SSJ (2008) EWHC 1707 (Admin)]] | |||
==Other== | ==Other== | ||
Line 14: | Line 26: | ||
The Second Respondent did not appear | The Second Respondent did not appear | ||
==External | ==Citations== | ||
{{bailii | [2011] EWCA Civ 1608, [2012] All ER (D) 92 (Jan) | ||
==External links== | |||
{{#bailii:(2011) EWCA Civ 1608}} | |||
[http://odonnells-solicitors.co.uk/mh-jod-article.html John O'Donnell, 'Defining Liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 14/2/12)] | |||
[[Category:Discharge conditions]] | [[Category:Discharge conditions cases]] | ||
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | [[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2011 cases]] | [[Category:2011 cases]] |
Latest revision as of 21:43, 9 October 2023
The Mental Health Tribunal may not grant a conditional discharge in circumstances where the conditions would inevitably lead to an Article 5 deprivation of liberty. Postscript: see PJ v A Local Health Board [2015] UKUT 480 (AAC).
Related judgments
Other related cases:
- R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin)
- R (SSHD) v MHRT, re MP (2004) EWHC 2194
- R (IT) v SSJ [2008] EWHC 1707 (Admin)
Other
Hearing: 12/10/11
Judgment 20/12/11
Before Maurice Kay, Arden, Moses LJJ
Mr Martin Chamberlain (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Appellant
Mr Simon Burrows (instructed by odonnells Solicitors) for the First Respondent
The Second Respondent did not appear
Citations
[2011] EWCA Civ 1608B, [2012] All ER (D) 92 (Jan)
External links
John O'Donnell, 'Defining Liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 14/2/12)
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: