LG v DK (2011) EWHC 2453 (COP): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{thanks|Alex Ruck-Keene" to "{{thanks|Ruck Keene, Alex") |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Citations== | ==Citations== | ||
[2011] All ER (D) 31 (Oct) | [2012] 2 All ER 115, [2011] All ER (D) 31 (Oct) | ||
==External | ==Thanks== | ||
{{bailii | {{thanks|Ruck Keene, Alex|39 Essex Chambers}} | ||
==External links== | |||
{{#bailii:(2011) EWHC 2453 (COP)|no}} | |||
[[Media:LG v DK (2011) EWHC 2453 (COP).doc|Transcript]] | [[Media:LG v DK (2011) EWHC 2453 (COP).doc|Transcript]] |
Latest revision as of 20:55, 29 May 2021
Application to Court of Protection to decide whether it is in DK's best interests to provide DNA sample for paternity test. [Summary to follow.]
Citations
[2012] 2 All ER 115, [2011] All ER (D) 31 (Oct)
Thanks
Thanks to Alex Ruck Keene (39 Essex Chambers) for providing the judgment.
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: