Open justice | Let us know if you have a tribunal decision you would like to publish (see Re A)
Email updates | CPD scheme

Online forum | Latest topic on forum: Part 2 signature and date of form H5 missing, and accidentally added to Part 4 | News

Clift v Slough BC (2010) EWCA Civ 1484: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach ...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.''
''An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of [[Article 8]]; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.''
==Citations==
Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 and ''not'' [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 (a version of the judgment had been published with that NCN, which was allocated to another case).


==External link==
==External link==
{{bailii|[2010] EWCA Civ 1484}}
{{#bailii:[2010] EWCA Civ 1484}}


[[:File:Mind Legal Newsletter March 2011.pdf|Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 8, March 2011)]]
[[:File:Mind Legal Newsletter March 2011.pdf|Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 8, March 2011)]]


[[Category:Miscellaneous]]
[[Category:Miscellaneous cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]

Latest revision as of 08:22, 2 May 2021

An email from a local authority stating that Clift was on its violent persons register was published too widely: (1) the disproportionate publication was an unjustified breach of Article 8; (2) the Article 8 breach prevented the local authority from using the qualified privilege defence to defamation.

Citations

Note that the correct citation is [2010] EWCA Civ 1484B and not [2010] EWCA Civ 1171B (a version of the judgment had been published with that NCN, which was allocated to another case).

External link

BAILII

Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 8, March 2011)

Retrieved from "https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Clift_v_Slough_BC_(2010)_EWCA_Civ_1484&oldid=51824"