R v AN (2004) EWCA Crim 3238: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there ...") |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWCA\/Crim\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii: [$1] EWCA Crim $2}}") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was | ''(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was not excessive.'' | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [2004] EWCA Crim 3238}} | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2004 cases]] | [[Category:2004 cases]] | ||
[[Category:Sentence appeal cases]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 25 April 2021
(1) Although the medical evidence recommended a hospital order, the judge had been entitled to exercise his discretion not to impose a hospital order, particularly since there was no causal connection between the mental illness and the offending. (2) The 12-year sentence was not excessive.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: