Anam v SSHD (2009) EWHC 2496 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.'' | ''It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.'' | ||
==Related judgments== | |||
[[Anam v SSHD (2010) EWCA Civ 1140]] | |||
*[[Anam v SSHD (2009) EWHC 2496 (Admin)]] | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2009] EWHC 2496 (Admin)}} | ||
[[Category:Repatriation cases]] | [[Category:Repatriation cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:31, 12 May 2020
It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.
Related judgments
Anam v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 1140
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: