Re MB (Medical Treatment) (1997) EWCA Civ 3093: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - " [Summary required.]" to "")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." [Summary required.]
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February."


==Citations==
==Citations==
Line 5: Line 5:


==External link==
==External link==
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/1997/3093.html Bailii]
{{#bailii: [1997] EWCA Civ 3093}}


{{stub}}


[[Category:Best interests]]
[[Category:Best interests]]

Latest revision as of 19:15, 26 April 2021

"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February."

Citations

[1997] 2 FLR 426B

External link

BAILII