Re MB (Medical Treatment) (1997) EWCA Civ 3093: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a you…') |
m (Text replacement - " [Summary required.]" to "") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." [ | "This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February." | ||
==Citations== | |||
[1997] 2 FLR 426 | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii: [1997] EWCA Civ 3093}} | ||
[[Category:Best interests]] | [[Category:Best interests]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:15, 26 April 2021
"This appeal arose from the application by a health authority for a declaration from the High Court that it would be lawful for the consultant gynaecologist to operate upon a young woman, Miss MB, who was 40 weeks pregnant and admitted to hospital on Friday 14th February."
Citations
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: