R (Johnson) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 3336 (Admin): Difference between revisions

(Created page with '''The Secretary of State's decision that the next Parole Board review would occur 14-15 months after the last review was unsupported by any reason and, on the facts, inconsistent…')
 
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/ew\/cases\/EWHC\/(.*)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] EWHC $3 ($1)}}")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''The Secretary of State's decision that the next Parole Board review would occur 14-15 months after the last review was unsupported by any reason and, on the facts, inconsistent with [[Article 5]](4).''
''The Secretary of State's decision that the next Parole Board review would occur 14-15 months after the last review was unsupported by any reason and, on the facts, inconsistent with [[Article 5]](4).''
==Other==
Judgment: 18 December 2009
Hearing date: 3 December 2009
Before: Langstaff J
Mr Southey (instructed by Chivers Solicitors) for the Claimant
Mr Gerard Clarke (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Defendant


==External link==
==External link==
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/3336.html Bailii]
{{#bailii:[2009] EWHC 3336 (Admin)}}


{{stub}}


[[Category:Prison law]]
[[Category:Prison law cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]

Latest revision as of 10:39, 25 April 2021

The Secretary of State's decision that the next Parole Board review would occur 14-15 months after the last review was unsupported by any reason and, on the facts, inconsistent with Article 5(4).

Other

Judgment: 18 December 2009

Hearing date: 3 December 2009

Before: Langstaff J

Mr Southey (instructed by Chivers Solicitors) for the Claimant

Mr Gerard Clarke (instructed by Treasury Solicitor) for the Defendant

External link

BAILII