Anam v SSHD (2009) EWHC 2496 (Admin): Difference between revisions

(Created page with '''It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declarati…')
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.''
''It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.''
==Related judgments==
[[Anam v SSHD (2010) EWCA Civ 1140]]
*[[Anam v SSHD (2009) EWHC 2496 (Admin)]]


==External link==
==External link==
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/2496.html Bailii]
{{#bailii:[2009] EWHC 2496 (Admin)}}
 
{{stub}}


[[Category:Deportation]]
[[Category:Repatriation cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]
[[Category:2009 cases]]

Latest revision as of 21:31, 12 May 2020

It is the Secretary of State's policy not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in "very exceptional circumstances". The claimant was entitled to a declaration that the SoS had unlawfully failed to consider the implications of his policy; however, the detention was not in breach of the policy, and continued detention was lawful.

Related judgments

Anam v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 1140

External link

BAILII