Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 (2005) ECHR 936: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '''Although a detained patient's case was regularly reviewed on an automatic basis, the patient had no right to initiate proceedings and was not a party to them; there therefore h...') |
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Although a detained patient's case was regularly reviewed on an automatic basis, the patient had no right to initiate proceedings and was not a party to them; there therefore had been a breach of [[Article 5]](4)'' | ''Although a detained patient's case was regularly reviewed on an automatic basis, the patient had no right to initiate proceedings and was not a party to them; there therefore had been a breach of [[Article 5]](4)'' | ||
==Related judgments== | |||
[[Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 (2005) ECHR 936]] | |||
*[[Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 (2004) ECHR 726]] (admissibility) | |||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
[ | {{#bailii:[2005] ECHR 936}} | ||
[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]] | |||
[[Category:ECHR]] | [[Category:ECHR]] | ||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2005 cases]] | [[Category:2005 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 25 April 2021
Although a detained patient's case was regularly reviewed on an automatic basis, the patient had no right to initiate proceedings and was not a party to them; there therefore had been a breach of Article 5(4)
Related judgments
Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 [2005] ECHR 936
- Gorshkov v Ukraine 67531/01 [2004] ECHR 726 (admissibility)
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: