Page values for "Rutten v The Netherlands 32605/96 (2001) ECHR 482"
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | 2008-11-27 10:22:17 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2021-04-25 11:15:20 AM |
| _creator | String | Jonathan |
| _fullText | Searchtext | ''The decision to renew the patient's confinement order was taken after the order had expired, but under domestic law there was nothing requiring release in these circumstances; under Convention law the detention was not arbitrary, being based on a court order and expert evidence, so there was no vi ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | 2001 cases • Brief summary • ECHR • ECHR deprivation of liberty cases • Judgment available on Bailii • Transcript |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Rutten v The Netherlands 32605/96 (2001) ECHR 482 |
| _pageID | Integer | 4,190 |
| _pageName | Page | Rutten v The Netherlands 32605/96 (2001) ECHR 482 |
| _pageTitle | String | Rutten v The Netherlands 32605/96 [2001] ECHR 482 |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |