Page values for "R (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC (2021) EWCA Civ 1957"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2022-01-12 11:37:52 AM
_modificationDateDatetime2023-06-26 8:03:16 PM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2021/12/22 |NCN=[2021] EWCA Civ 1957 |ICLR=[2022] WLR(D) 14 |ICLR ID=2021001460 |Other citations=[2022] PTSR 833 |Court=Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |Judges=Coulson, Carr, William Davis |Parties=Worcestershire County Council, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Swindon Bo ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2021 cases After-care Cases Community care ICLR summary Judgment available on Bailii Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function Judgment_available_on_Bailii 2021_cases
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringR (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC (2021) EWCA Civ 1957
_pageIDInteger14,061
_pageNamePageR (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC (2021) EWCA Civ 1957
_pageTitleString

R (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC [2021] EWCA Civ 1957

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Ordinary residence and s117

SummaryWikitext

JG was detained under s3 in Worcestershire (Area 1), discharged to residential care in Swindon (Area 2), detained again under s3 in Swindon and discharged again. The Court of Appeal held that: (1) Area 1's duty subsists until it comes to an end by a s117(2) decision that the patient "is no longer in need" of aftercare services (ordinary residence in area 2 when subsequently detained makes no difference); there had been no such decision so the duty continued throughout both the second period of detention and beyond. (2) Obiter, by the ordinary meaning of "ordinarily resident" and under the Shah test JG was ordinarily resident in Swindon immediately before the second detention, and there was nothing in subsequent caselaw (including Cornwall) or the Care Act 2014 amendments (including the change from "resident" to "ordinarily resident") justifying a different conclusion.

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,After-care Community care
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2021-12-22
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,Coulson Carr William Davis
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,Worcestershire County Council Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Swindon Borough Council
CourtStringCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
NCNString[2021] EWCA Civ 1957
MHLRString
ICLRString[2022] WLR(D) 14
ICLR_IDString2021001460
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,[2022] PTSR 833
CitesList of String, delimiter: #R (Hertfordshire CC) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham (2011) EWCA Civ 77
External_linksText*'"`UNIQ--item-1446--QINU`"'[[Luke Clements, 'What a mess - s117 ordinary residence (again)' (2/1/22)]] — '"`UNIQ--item-1447--QINU`"' *[https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2022-0022.html Supreme Court case details page]&#32;<span class="archive-icon">[https://web.archive.org/web/20230428203722/https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2022-0022.html <i class="fa fa-university" title="This is an Internet Archive link"></i>]</span>. You can watch a video of the 27/4/23 hearing online.
JudgmentFile

"News" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
Which_tableStringCases
RSS_titleWikitext
RSS_descriptionWikitext
RSS_pubdateDatetime2022-01-12 9:21:57 AM