Page values for "R (Liverpool City Council) v SSH (2017) EWHC 986 (Admin)"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2017-05-06 11:09:09 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2021-10-05 9:55:29 AM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2017/03/02 |NCN=[2017] EWHC 986 (Admin) |ICLR=[2017] WLR(D) 314 |ICLR ID=2016097483 |Other citations=[2017] PTSR 1564, [2017] MHLO 15 |Court=High Court (Administrative Court) |Judges=Garnham |Parties=Liverpool City Council, Nottinghamshire County Council, London Borough of Richmond upon ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |2017 cases Cases Deprivation of liberty ICLR summary Judgment available on Bailii Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function Judgment_available_on_Bailii 2017_cases
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringR (Liverpool City Council) v SSH (2017) EWHC 986 (Admin)
_pageIDInteger8,864
_pageNamePageR (Liverpool City Council) v SSH (2017) EWHC 986 (Admin)
_pageTitleString

R (Liverpool City Council) v SSH [2017] EWHC 986 (Admin)

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

DOLS funding case

SummaryWikitext

"By these proceedings, four English councils seek to challenge what they describe as the government's 'ongoing failure to provide full, or even adequate, funding for local authorities in England to implement the deprivation of liberty regime'. They suggest that the financial shortfall suffered by councils across the country generally is somewhere between one third of a billion pounds and two thirds of a billion pounds each year and claim that the Government must meet that shortfall. They seek a declaration that, by his failure to meet those costs, the Secretary of State for Health has created an unacceptable risk of illegality and is in breach of a policy known as the 'New Burdens Doctrine'. They seek a mandatory order requiring the Secretary of State of Health to remove the 'unacceptable risk of illegality' and to comply with that doctrine."

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,Deprivation of liberty
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2017-03-02
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,Garnham
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,Liverpool City Council Nottinghamshire County Council London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Shropshire Council Secretary of State for Health Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
CourtStringHigh Court (Administrative Court)
NCNString[2017] EWHC 986 (Admin)
MHLRString
ICLRString[2017] WLR(D) 314
ICLR_IDString2016097483
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,[2017] PTSR 1564 [2017] MHLO 15
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksText[http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2017/05/03/councils-lose-court-battle-deprivation-liberty-funding/&mhlo=s Andy McNicoll, 'Councils lose court battle for more deprivation of liberty funding' (Community Care, 3/5/17)]&#32;<span class="saved-icon">[https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Law_Online:Saved_documents <i class="fa fa-archive" title="If the external link is dead: contact me and I will send you my copy"></i>]</span>
JudgmentFile