Page values for "London Borough of Lewisham (20 006 910) (2021) MHLO 5"

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetime2021-10-25 8:27:06 PM
_modificationDateDatetime2025-03-08 11:14:27 PM
_creatorStringJonathan
_fullTextSearchtext{{Case |Date=2021/04/13 |Court=Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman |Parties=NHS South East London CCG, London Borough of Lewisham, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust |Sentence=Section 117 and Housing Benefit |Summary=The council, CCG and trust initially reneged on a promise to upd ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringLondon Borough of Lewisham (20 006 910) (2021) MHLO 5
_pageIDInteger13,932
_pageNamePageLondon Borough of Lewisham (20 006 910) (2021) MHLO 5
_pageTitleString

London Borough of Lewisham (20 006 910) [2021] MHLO 5

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"News" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
Which_tableStringCases
RSS_titleWikitext
RSS_descriptionWikitext
RSS_pubdateDatetime2021-10-25 8:20:49 PM

"Cases" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
SentenceWikitext

Section 117 and Housing Benefit

SummaryWikitext

The council, CCG and trust initially reneged on a promise to update their s117 policy, but eventually changed it to state: "If accommodation is included as part of after-care, it should not be charged for, nor should person be told to claim Housing Benefit. Service and utility charges should be deemed part of the s117 accommodation." Ombudsman's summary: "The Ombudsmen investigated and upheld an earlier complaint about charging for accommodation which should have been free under section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983. We have now investigated a complaint about the [London Borough of Lewisham], [South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust] and [NHS South East London CCG] failing to carry out actions agreed during the earlier investigation. We have upheld the complaint. We have also found that an estimated 57 other patients may not have up-to-date section 117 aftercare plans. The organisations accept our recommendations, so we have completed our investigation."

DetailText
SubjectList of String, delimiter: ,After-care
Judicial_historyWikitext
Judicial_history_first_pagePage
DateDate2021-04-13
JudgesList of String, delimiter: ,
PartiesList of String, delimiter: ,NHS South East London CCG London Borough of Lewisham South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
CourtStringLocal Government and Social Care Ombudsman
NCNString
MHLRString
ICLRString
ICLR_IDString
EssexString
Essex_issueString
Essex_pageString
Other_citationsList of String, delimiter: ,
CitesList of String, delimiter: #
External_linksTextThe LGSCO website has the same decision on three different pages, relating to the three different bodies: * [https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/health/mental-health-services/20-006-910&mhlo=z London Borough of Lewisham (20 006 910)]&#32;<span class="saved-icon">[https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Law_Online:Saved_documents <i class="fa fa-archive" title="If the external link is dead: contact me and I will send you my copy"></i>]</span> * [https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/health/mental-health-services/20-006-910a&mhlo=z South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (20 006 910a)]&#32;<span class="saved-icon">[https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Law_Online:Saved_documents <i class="fa fa-archive" title="If the external link is dead: contact me and I will send you my copy"></i>]</span> * [https://www.lgo.org.uk/decisions/health/mental-health-services/20-006-910b&mhlo=z NHS South East London Clinical Commissioning Group (20 006 910b)]&#32;<span class="saved-icon">[https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Law_Online:Saved_documents <i class="fa fa-archive" title="If the external link is dead: contact me and I will send you my copy"></i>]</span>
JudgmentFile