Page values for "Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT)"
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | 2021-07-01 9:52:46 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | 2021-07-01 9:52:46 PM |
| _creator | String | Jonathan |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Information-header}} See [[Tribunal rule 39]]. In DA v Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust [2019] UKUT 348 (AAC) the tribunal refused to adjourn the case of a CTO patient who had not attended the hearing, then the solicitor left the hearing because she felt unable to represent t ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Mental Health Tribunal pages • Pages_using_DynamicPageList3_parser_function |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT) |
| _pageID | Integer | 13,350 |
| _pageName | Page | Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT) |
| _pageTitle | String | Hearing in a party’s absence (MHT) |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |