View source for Re T (Children) (2012) UKSC 36, (2012) MHLO 100

''A local authority should not be liable for the costs of interveners against whom allegations have been reasonably made that are held unfounded; the general practice of not awarding costs against a party, including a local authority, in the absence of reprehensible behaviour or an unreasonable stance, is one that accords with the ends of justice and which should not be subject to an exception in the case of split hearings. (This case related to care proceedings.)''

==ICLR==
{{ICLR|Re T (Children) (2012) UKSC 36, (2012) MHLO 100}}

==External links==
{{#bailii:[2012] UKSC 36}}

[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?docID=WLRD2012-223 ICLR]

[[:File:CoP newsletter August 2012.pdf|39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 24, August 2012)]] ('Although the decision relates to costs in proceedings about children, some of the public policy arguments relied on are equally relevant to the Court of Protection.')

[[Category:Miscellaneous cases]]
[[Category:Detailed summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]