View source for R (G) v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 747 (Admin)

''The claimant sought judicial review of the NHS Trust and the Met police in relation to a proposed visit to his home. (1) A [[civil restraint order]] had been made after the JR application was made: so he did not need leave of the High Court to have the claim considered on the papers; however, he did need leave for this renewed application for permission. (2) On the merits, permission would have been refused because (a) it is not the function of the court to review operational decisions such as this, and (b) the claimant had not been detained so the points regarding the MHA were academic. (3) In any event, the civil restraint order was thoroughly appropriate and would not be discharged.''

==Judgment (Crown Copyright)==
The transcript will remain below until it is published on Bailii:

{{Text:R (G) v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 747 (Admin) - transcript}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2011] EWHC 747 (Admin)|no}}
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
[[Category:Unimportant cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2011 cases]]