View source for Lucia Benyu (SRA decision: control of practice) (2014) MHLO 99 (SRA)

''(1) The SRA decided that as Lucia Benyu, née Ndoro, was in an Individual Voluntary Arrangement, and her conduct was under investigation, the following conditions on her 2013/14 practising certificate were necessary: (a) she may act as a solicitor only as an employee; which role has first been approved in writing by the SRA; she is not a sole practitioner, or a manager or owner of any authorised body or authorised non-SRA firm except as a minority share owner in Peters Legal Limited (SRA ID 607645); (c) she does not hold, receive or have access to client money or have responsibility for any client money; (d) she is not a signatory to any client or office account and does not have the power to authorise electronic payments or transfers from any client or office account; (e) Mrs Benyu shall immediately inform any actual or prospective employer of these conditions and the reasons for their imposition. (2) She was subsequently struck off the roll of solicitors by an order of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal dated 3/10/14.''

==Related judgments==
{{related judgments|Lucia Benyu of Peters Legal Limited (SRA decision: prosecution) (2014) MHLO 15 (SRA)}}
==External link==
{{#bailii:no ncn}}

{{link|https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/266709/|SRA website|s}}

[[Category:SRA decisions]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]