View source for J Council v GU (2012) EWHC 3531 (COP), (2012) MHLO 137

"Happily, all parties have agreed a final order which they invite me to approve. I am satisfied that it is a proper order to make and its terms and provisions are fully in the interests of George. However the case has given rise to interesting questions about [[Article 8]] of the European Convention on Human Rights and what the scope of the safeguards should be to ensure compliance with it for the future. I have been exhorted to give a judgment which states unambiguously that the arrangements which I approve are compliant with Article 8. It is said that this judgment is likely to be looked at in any case presenting similar facts." [Detailed summary available.]

==FLW==
{{FLW|J Council v GU (2012) EWHC 3531 (COP), (2012) MHLO 137}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2012) EWHC 3531 (COP)}}

[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed106518 Alison Easton, 'J Council v GU & Ors' (Family Law Week, 13/12/12)]

[http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/01/07/court-of-protection-approves-arrangements-for-safeguarding-article-8-rights-of-detained-man/ Richard Mumford, 'Court of Protection approves arrangements for safeguarding Article 8 rights of detained man' (7/1/13)]

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:Detailed summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2012 cases]]