View source for Hysaj v SSHD (2014) EWCA Civ 1633, (2014) MHLO 135

''In each of these three cases, which were heard together, the applicant failed to file a notice of appeal within the time prescribed by [[CPR]] 52.4(2), which made it necessary for him to seek an extension of time. The mental health case involved a nearest relative who had been awarded costs after displacement proceedings and who (nearly six years out of time) wished to appeal against the sum ordered by the judge. The Court of Appeal, having held that the guidance in the Mitchell and Denton cases applied to applications for extensions of time for filing a notice of appeal, dealt with some questions of general importance (public law cases, shortage of funds, litigants in person, the merits). In the mental health case, the extension of time was refused.''

==ICLR==
{{ICLR|Hysaj v SSHD (2014) EWCA Civ 1633, (2014) MHLO 135}}

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCA Civ 1633}}

[[Category:Miscellaneous cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]