Cover - Annual Review 2021.jpg

Re S; D v R (the deputy of S) [2010] EWHC 3748 (COP)

Costs judgment in Court of Protection: (1) up to the December 2009 hearing, because the proceedings had been necessary, the normal rule that costs were to be paid by S's estate was to apply, but (2) from that point onwards, because of her conduct of proceedings, Mrs D was to bear her own costs, plus 75% of the Deputy's costs on the standard (not indemnity) basis.

Related judgments

Sharma v Hunters [2011] EWHC 2546 (COP)

Thanks

Thanks to Alex Ruck Keene (39 Essex Chambers) for providing the judgment.

External links

Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)

Transcript