Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam), [2016] MHLO 47
"In essence, K says that this court should intervene because his son lacks capacity to be able to decide contact. More recently he has made an application to remove Miss O'Connell as a litigation friend for L. ... By the order I made on 15 November 2013, I found that L had capacity to decide about residence and care and I made orders under the inherent jurisdiction regulating what contact there should be between L and his father, as I considered him to be a vulnerable adult, he needed orders being made to ensure he retained his capacity... There is no evidence that L's capacity has changed."
Related judgments
Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam), [2016] MHLO 47
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam), [2013] MHLO 149
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam), [2013] MHLO 148
- LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam), [2012] MHLO 185
- Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
- LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2010] EWHC 2422 (COP) (Baker J, 31/3/00) - transcript not available at time of writing
- LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
- Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
- LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam), [2012] MHLO 185
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam), [2013] MHLO 148